Stable Releases
Bug reports for stable releases.
2506 reports in this category
-
I updated my headless server about 3 days ago from the previous latest stable version to 6.11.0 however it never came back online. After connecting to monitor today I see that it tries to boot gets to the automatic Unraid boot screen then loops and starts over continuously.
- Solved
- Urgent
- 1453 views
-
yesterday I have tried to update my working 6.10 system to 6.11, The update seemed to work flawlessly at the beginning. But then more and more users rang me up, they could not access the shares anymore. Their (stored) passwords were refused. I noticed that even me, the admin, was locked out 😞 All access from windows machines was denied, FreeBSD with Samba also could not mount shares anymore, just Boxes with Libreelec (Linux) still could connect to the shares.
- Closed
- 7165 views
-
Hey, My Mainboad: ASRock J4105-ITX My Onboard NIC: RTL8111H iperf comparison: 6.8.3: root@Unimatrix01:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.10.10 Connecting to host 192.168.10.10, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.10.11 port 56480 connected to 192.168.10.10 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 114 MBytes 954 Mbits/sec 0 237 KBytes [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 111 MBytes 932 Mbits/s
- Closed
- Minor
- 741 views
-
- Solved
- Minor
- 1929 views
-
Upgraded to 6.11.1 last night & this morning noticed this oddity. 1 - Click shares 2 - Click Calculate size 3 - Notice shares on the array are being reported as 0TB 4 - I know my Plex 'Data' share is around 5TB 5 - Also other shares not screenshot-ed are showing 0TB. 5 - Data still accessible on the actual array disks - Screenshot below - Diagnostics attached. moulin-rouge-diagnostics-20221007-1241.zip
- Annoyance
- 679 views
-
Overview webGUI can set out of spec large cookies that are breaking some functionality (notably docker VNC connectivity) Problem source https://wiki.unraid.net/Manual/Release_Notes/Unraid_OS_6.10.0#Other_Improvements The optional Network traffic graph [introduced with 6.10.0] in the INTERFACE dashboard panel stores the rolling history in two cookies: rxd-init & txd-init. The value is recorded at 1 second intervals for a history of 10s | 30s | 1min | 2min
- Solved
- Minor
- 1342 views
-
Here is log: Oct 8 02:48:34 UNRAID nmbd[19324]: [2022/10/08 02:48:34.533925, 0] ../../source3/nmbd/nmbd.c:59(terminate) Oct 8 02:48:34 UNRAID nmbd[19324]: Got SIGTERM: going down... Oct 8 02:48:38 UNRAID smbd[1165]: [2022/10/08 02:48:38.195511, 0] ../../source3/smbd/server.c:1741(main) Oct 8 02:48:38 UNRAID smbd[1165]: smbd version 4.17.0 started. Oct 8 02:48:38 UNRAID smbd[1165]: Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022 Oct 8 02:48:38 UNRAI
- Minor
- 736 views
-
Since updating to 6.11 I have been unable to update most docker containers. Some containers are orphaned and trying to remove them manually I get a vague "Server Error". When trying to update a single container or update all containers, the output shows that the removal of the existing image fails, and can't create the new image because an image with that name already exists. I'm stuck with some permanently orphaned images, and some dockers that fail to start with "Server Error" i ha
- Closed
- 2070 views
-
Just a cosmetical thing. Please have a look at this screenshot: Is downloading of the ZIP file done as well?
- Annoyance
- 364 views
-
I have two linux VM's. I changed both to Spice to try it out. Spice would not connect when using a different port than 80 or 443. So, using port 88 would not connect. But, once I was able to view, I was presented with the following screens. I checked the boot manager and it is still set correctly. I changed back to VNC, but still getting the no boot errors.
- Minor
- 627 views
-
So i am on 6.10.3 and nested VMs run totally fine. I have a windows server running a VMware server and it hosts 2 guest OS on it. as soon as i upgrade to 6.11 or 6.11 RC versions, the guest OS on VMware stop starting up. I am on a threadripper with 256 GB ram. See the screenshot i see when i try to run the VM guest I would really like to go to 6.11 and latest versions.. so good features are being released. But this is holding me back. Pls help or guide.
- Annoyance
- 388 views
-
After upgrade to 6.11, UnRaid no longer sees the drives attached to the adapter consistently, and when it does, they often experience a reset or read/write errors which show up in dmesg. System is a Dell R7515 with latest BIOS 2.8.5 CPU is AMD Epyc R7313p HBA330 Mini is latest firmware from Dell: 16.17.01.00, A08 I have power cycled the machine several times, updated whatever I can and also checked kernel change logs and haven't seen anything relevant.
- Urgent
- 3781 views
-
I am unable to specifically reproduce it but when playing with a second interface, setting it to ipv6 and ipv4 only and back and to ip4 + ipv6 and just play with a second interface it sometimes resets eth0 and eth1. The network.ini file in /var/local/emhttp then is broken and includes only the last 4 lines. I tried to eliminate a race condition (2 requests trying save at the same time), but sometimes managed to reproduced it even if when waiting several minutes between re
- Minor
- 363 views
-
Since upgrading to 6.11.0 im unable to view or download the peer configuration is unusable. After click there are two calls against the unraid server - a websocket call against sub/changes which never results into anything and is always pending - an http call against: webGui/include/StartCommand.php POST with data: `wg_config peer-tron-wg1-4 /peers nchan` which results in a single int the lghtbox below opens and nothing happens anymore. Logs are clea
- Minor
- 694 views
-
when i try to start the service, sometimes it somehow does starts, BUT only if there is no added peer. If i add a peer there is always this error: [#] ip -4 route flush table 202 [#] ip -4 route add default via table 202 Error: inet address is expected rather than "table". [#] ip link delete dev wg2
- Minor
- 1030 views
-
Hi, I read a lot in the other threads, but no possible solution worked for my Windowssystem and I haven't found anything my my other machines. With 6.10.3 everything was fine. Like I read the kernel support of SMB1 was deleted. Actual situation: With share set to "Private" I can't access the shares. Error message "You don't have access rights" or "The local device name is used. Connection can't be established". It doesn't matter which setting I use on WIndows
- Urgent
- 2310 views
-
I'm used to entering cidr ip addresses so I naturally put /24 on the end of my ip in a bridged vlan, saving this throws an invalid ip address error (because we only want the ip) and the container is no longer in your list and you need to re-create it.
- Closed
- Minor
- 542 views
-
Hi currently have 2 system with unRAID 1: i7 4470k / 32gb ram and 10x 8TB on 6.11 , no issues with this one. motherboard : Asus Z87-PRO 2: i7 4470k / 16Gb ram and 5x 8TB , 5x3TB and 2x 6TB (HBA SAS2008 F:20.0.70.0) , motherboard Asus : Z87-A was on 6.11 ,keeps freezing and have to hard reboot the system. reverted back to 6.11.rc5 and will post back in a few days if it resolved it and post diags
- Solved
- Urgent
- 716 views
-
Greetings. I posted about this in a few places hoping to gain some visibility, including here: So I'm trying a new 'bug report' now... The gist is that if the 'Post Arguments' field is used on a container (that is set to auto-start) to do something like '&& docker network connect...' with the intent of adding a second (or third, etc.) network to a container the rc script is unable to start the container on reboot, docker restart, etc. because i
- Minor
- 1174 views
-
Hello, Since the update, less than a minut after spin down, a read smart is triggered. It constantly keep my array spinning : Sep 28 07:04:48 Sparta emhttpd: spinning down /dev/sde Sep 28 07:05:56 Sparta emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sde Sep 28 07:18:48 Sparta emhttpd: spinning down /dev/sdd Sep 28 07:19:55 Sparta emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sdd Sep 28 07:20:47 Sparta emhttpd: spinning down /dev/sde Sep 28 07:21:56 Sparta emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sde Sep 28 07:36:48 Sparta
- Closed
- 907 views
-
My config contains 2x T-Create NVMe 1TB drives. I have each in its own Cache Pool. On 6.10.3, the system sees both drives, and everything works great. After upgrading to 6.11, the system will only see 1 of the 2 drives. What's odd is that if I reboot the system multiple times, which drive shows up will change. In order to verify that this is in fact a 6.11 issue, I created a new 6.10.3 flash drive, and it sees both NVMe drives every boot, and a clean 6.11 flash drive will only show one. Har
- Annoyance
- 689 views
-
When updating dockers there is a 'please wait' message even though everything is done. Not an actual issue, it just can be a little confusing. PS: Would be nice if we add some color text to completed/errors?
- Annoyance
- 488 views
-
Using version 6.10.3 Container disappears after reboot. If you try to start manually it shows: No such container Compose used: version: "3" # More info at https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/ and https://docs.pi-hole.net/ # Listas em https://firebog.net/ services: pihole: container_name: pihole image: pihole/pihole:latest # For DHCP it is recommended to remove these ports and instead add: network_mode: "host" ports: - "53:53/tcp" - "53:53/
- Closed
- Minor
- 1830 views
-
i noticed in the release notes of 6.11 that xml changes to the vms ports would stay after a form update but i'm finding only the graphics port stays but the websocket port reverts. i use a custom websocket port so i can bookmark my vnc webgui's for the vms i wish to do so and the revert has always been frustrating. any chance this will be done as well?
- Minor
- 516 views
-
so here goes the long version why i want to know that: I have read many bug reports of this, but nothing ever came of it in any thread. its always the plugins, the vms, a docker container etc. Well, as with so many people not for me, it could not be pinned to any of those culprits. I have booted in safe mode, i have manually disabled docker and vm service, no mover, no script, my appdata and system shares are on cache only and i have made sure not a single computer
- Solved
- Annoyance
- 7375 views
