ChatNoir

Moderators
  • Posts

    3676
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by ChatNoir

  1. Ca semble lié au plugin Unraid Connect. Tu auras plus de chance d'avoir des réponses sur le sous-forum officel : https://forums.unraid.net/forum/94-connect-plugin-support/ (par contre, c'est en anglais)
  2. Moved to the German section, if you want to post in the general forum, please use English.
  3. Changed Status to Closed Changed Priority to Other
  4. This is not a bug, it's the way it is designed. The configuration is stored in a cookie on your browser. So a different browser can be configured differently depending on your use case or resolution.
  5. Are you still seeing the problem on 6.12.2 ? Because nothing will be changed on 6.11.x
  6. Not really, Flash is the used size of the flash drive, etc.
  7. RAM usage is only the first line, the last line is about you docker image size if I am not mistaking.
  8. Don't hesitate to report trolls so moderators and administrators can act on it. It does not guarantee a moderation action but we don't see every message and one or several reports can make us reconsider our initial judgement on some users messages and behavior.
  9. Il te faut activer le syslog server pour avoir des journaux persistants (sinon ils sont en RAM comme le reste de l'OS). Tu peux faire un miroir sur ta clé USB mais uniquement temporairement le temps de débuggé, ce n'est pas conseillé à long terme pour la durée de vie de la clé.
  10. Et si tu mets 'Automatically split any directory as required' ? Après, possible que Rclone crée d'abord tous les fichiers à 0 octets (donc sur un seul disque vu que ça ne prend pas de place) avant de les écrire vraiment ? Si c'est ça, Unraid remplace toujours un fichier où le trouve initialement ce qui pourrait créer ton problème.
  11. Et même pour les pools multi-disques, le BTRFS est beaucoup plus flexible de mon point de vue que le ZFS. Par exemple, mon cache est un RAID10 sur lequel je pourrais rajouter facilement un 5e disque (de même taille ou différente) et utiliser toute sa capacité sans perte (selon la taille utilisée). En ZFS, je pense que je devrais ajouter 4 nouveaux disques. Perso je vais rester en XFS pour l'Array et BTRFS pour les pools tant que je n'aurais pas de vrai bénéfice. Et sinon, aucun problème sur la 6.12.
  12. Bizarre @dam448, ça marchait très bien sous 6.11.5 et maintenant sur 6.12.2. Par contre, ça ne protège que des suppressions depuis le réseau sur les dossiers partagés en SMB.
  13. I can confirm on that on FF114. Clearing cached data on the browser did not change the behavior. Same thing on Chrome.
  14. Not sure to see a significant improvement from 6.12.2. It seems that some containers are more impacted than others (Plex, Jellyfin for example for me) On the other end, I am wondering it is an actual RAM usage problem or an issue of reporting from docker and/or kernel interpretation. (my table above uses 'docker_container_mem' ) On the same time period than the image above (15 days), my system RAM usage does not seem to be fluctuating much while docker is supposed to have reached ~27GB from an average of 8-9GB on 6.11. My total RAM is 64GB, so going from 9 to 27 should be clearly visible on the system. The Unraid Dashboard is consistant with my Grafana dashboard.
  15. It seems there was a bug report on that :
  16. Have you tried to clear your cache and/or cookies from the forum ? I cannot reproduce neither on Firefox nor Chrome. And if it was a common issue I would guess that there would have been many complaints already.
  17. hi, I removed your GUID. you should contact support with the necessary information, your name, email, GUID, etc.
  18. The question is : is it a Unraid problem ? or a linux+docker problem ? (ie new kernel + new docker version) If it's the second, not much that can be done here.
  19. I would agree that Docker RAM seems to have increased a lot since 6.12. I have no issues with the server though. (I made no change to my containers)
  20. https://unraid.net/blog/unraid-paid-support