itimpi Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 If you want to avoid a warning from FCP then avoid mounting it directly under /mnt. Normally devices managed via UD are mounted under /mnt/disks so you want it mounted as /mnt/disks/docker which should stop the warning from happening. Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Do not mount directly under /mnt this may give unwanted side effects. As @itimpisuggests mount it under /mnt/disks Quote Link to comment
stewartwb Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 Quick question - I stayed on the sidelines for a while - still running version 6.3.5. I'm ready to upgrade, and I would like to run Fix Common Problems / Upgrade Assistant. However, I get an error installing the current plugin, since it doesn't support such an old version of unRAID. I've also tried to install the Community Applications plugin, but I get the same error. Is there a way to install the last version of FCP that still works on unRAID 6.3.5? If not, I'll just wing it, checking everything manually. Thanks! Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 4 hours ago, stewartwb said: Quick question - I stayed on the sidelines for a while - still running version 6.3.5. I'm ready to upgrade, and I would like to run Fix Common Problems / Upgrade Assistant. However, I get an error installing the current plugin, since it doesn't support such an old version of unRAID. I've also tried to install the Community Applications plugin, but I get the same error. Is there a way to install the last version of FCP that still works on unRAID 6.3.5? If not, I'll just wing it, checking everything manually. Thanks! AFAIK CA Fix Common Problems should run on Unraid 6.3.5. See also this topic to do manual verifications and upgrade advice. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted September 23, 2018 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 9 hours ago, stewartwb said: Is there a way to install the last version of FCP that still works on unRAID 6.3.5? It should work. There's at least no code that prevents installation on 6.3 (or even 6.1/6.2) CA though does require 6.4 nowadays Quote Link to comment
PeterB Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 On 9/22/2018 at 11:34 AM, itimpi said: If you want to avoid a warning from FCP then avoid mounting it directly under /mnt. Okay. The default location, given when editing the location in the container settings for appdata, is /mnt/docker.... I guess I just assumed that the default was good, and used that mount point in UD. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted September 23, 2018 Author Share Posted September 23, 2018 1 minute ago, PeterB said: I guess I just assumed that the default was good, and used that mount point in UD. If UD allowed you to set a mount point of /mnt/docker, then your UD version is extremely out of date. For the longest time it has only allowed mount points of /mnt/disks/... (an annoyance to me for my use case / muscle memory, but I completely understand why) 1 Quote Link to comment
stewartwb Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 13 hours ago, Squid said: It should work. There's at least no code that prevents installation on 6.3 (or even 6.1/6.2) CA though does require 6.4 nowadays I appreciate the info on compatibility - thanks! I found the direct GIT URL by searching this thread, and all is good. One server upgraded to 6.6, the other is on its way. Quote Link to comment
rtho782 Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 I have reinstalled unraid after update issues and it has rediscovered all my dockers etc. This plugin has lots of the following error: The template URL the author specified is https://raw.githubusercontent.com/binhex/docker-templates/master/binhex/krusader.xml. The template can be updated automatically with the correct URL. When I click "Apply Fix" I get the following error: ERROR: Missing template. Any ideas? Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 2, 2018 Author Share Posted October 2, 2018 30 minutes ago, rtho782 said: reinstalled unraid 30 minutes ago, rtho782 said: Missing template. You probably didn't copy over (or inadvertently erased) the contents of config/plugins/dockerMan/templates-user on the flash drive. Quote Link to comment
rtho782 Posted October 2, 2018 Share Posted October 2, 2018 10 minutes ago, Squid said: You probably didn't copy over (or inadvertently erased) the contents of config/plugins/dockerMan/templates-user on the flash drive. The old USB was wiped/died during the 6.6.1 update, so no. Anything I can do? Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 3 hours ago, rtho782 said: Anything I can do? Make a backup of your flash in the future. You can always download a zipped copy of flash from Main - Boot Device - Flash - Flash Backup. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 3, 2018 Author Share Posted October 3, 2018 3 hours ago, rtho782 said: Anything I can do? Take a note of the path mappings / ports / etc for that app. Remove the app, then re-add it via Apps and recreate your ports / mappings. Quote Link to comment
jang430 Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 When using Unbalance, it says I have permission problems with files or folders. It suggested that I run fix common problems first. But running FCP with scanning, or extensive tests don't show any notice of permission problems. I remember it used to. I am using the latest version of FCP. I am using Unraid 6.6.1Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Try running the "docker safe fix permissions" tool. Quote Link to comment
richardsim7 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 I seem to getting this error on scans: "Docker Application sabnzbd has duplicated entries for CPU pinning" I had this for my other docker containers, so I deleted the info in the extra parameters fields and everything was fine, but no matter what I do with the sabnzbd container, it stays the same - any ideas? Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 7, 2018 Author Share Posted October 7, 2018 Post /config/plugins/dockerMan/templates-user/my-sabnzbd.xml on the flash drive here Quote Link to comment
richardsim7 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, Squid said: Post /config/plugins/dockerMan/templates-user/my-sabnzbd.xml on the flash drive here <?xml version="1.0"?> <Container version="2"> <Name>sabnzbd</Name> <Repository>linuxserver/sabnzbd:unstable</Repository> <Registry>https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/sabnzbd/</Registry> <Network>bridge</Network> <MyIP/> <Shell>sh</Shell> <Privileged>false</Privileged> <Support/> <Project/> <Overview>SABnzbd makes Usenet as simple and streamlined as possible by automating everything we can. All you have to$ [b][u][span style='color: #E80000;']Configuration[/span][/u][/b][br]
 [b]/config[/b] Where sabnzbd should store settings, log and configuration files[br]
 [b]/downloads[/b] Where you want sab to place downlaods that have completed[br]
 [b]/incomplete-downloads[/b] Where you want sab to place downlaods that are incomplete.
 </Overview> <Category/> <WebUI>http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/</WebUI> <TemplateURL/> <Icon>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxserver/docker-templates/master/linuxserver.io/img/sabnzbd-icon.png</Icon> <ExtraParams/> <PostArgs/> <CPUset>0,1,6,7</CPUset> <DateInstalled>1538943646</DateInstalled> <DonateText/> <DonateLink/> <Description>SABnzbd makes Usenet as simple and streamlined as possible by automating everything we can. All you have$ [b][u][span style='color: #E80000;']Configuration[/span][/u][/b][br]
 [b]/config[/b] Where sabnzbd should store settings, log and configuration files[br]
 [b]/downloads[/b] Where you want sab to place downlaods that have completed[br]
 [b]/incomplete-downloads[/b] Where you want sab to place downlaods that are incomplete.
 </Description> <Networking> <Mode>bridge</Mode> <Publish> <Port> <HostPort>8080</HostPort> <ContainerPort>8080</ContainerPort> <Protocol>tcp</Protocol> </Port> </Publish> </Networking> <Data> <Volume> <HostDir>/mnt/user/appdata/sabnzbd/</HostDir> <ContainerDir>/config</ContainerDir> <Mode>rw</Mode> </Volume> <Volume> <HostDir>/mnt/user/Downloads/</HostDir> <ContainerDir>/downloads</ContainerDir> <Mode>rw</Mode> </Volume> <Volume> <HostDir>/mnt/user/Downloads/</HostDir> <ContainerDir>/incomplete-downloads</ContainerDir> <Mode>rw</Mode> </Volume> <Volume> <HostDir>/mnt/user/Movies/</HostDir> <ContainerDir>/movies</ContainerDir> <Mode>rw</Mode> </Volume> </Data> <Environment> <Variable> <Value>99</Value> <Name>PUID</Name> <Mode/> </Variable> <Variable> <Value>100</Value> <Name>PGID</Name> <Mode/> </Variable> </Environment> <Labels/> <Config Name="Host Port 1" Target="8080" Default="8080" Mode="tcp" Description="Container Port: 8080" Type="Port" Dis$ <Config Name="Host Path 1" Target="/config" Default="/mnt/user/appdata/sabnzbd/" Mode="rw" Description="Container Pat$ <Config Name="Host Path 2" Target="/downloads" Default="/mnt/user/Downloads/" Mode="rw" Description="Container Path: $ <Config Name="Host Path 3" Target="/incomplete-downloads" Default="/mnt/user/Downloads/" Mode="rw" Description="Conta$ <Config Name="Key 1" Target="PUID" Default="99" Mode="" Description="Container Variable: PUID" Type="Variable" Displa$ <Config Name="Key 2" Target="PGID" Default="100" Mode="" Description="Container Variable: PGID" Type="Variable" Displ$ <Config Name="Movies" Target="/movies" Default="" Mode="rw" Description="Container Path: /movies" Type="Path" Display$ </Container> I spy the CPUset stuff there, should I manually edit that out and try again? Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 7, 2018 Author Share Posted October 7, 2018 14 minutes ago, richardsim7 said: it stays the same - any ideas? 2 minutes ago, richardsim7 said: I spy the CPUset stuff there, should I manually edit that out and try again? Are you saying that on a rescan, FCP is still stating the error about ExtraParameters? Quote Link to comment
richardsim7 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 When I edit the docker, remove the parameters - the results from rescanning are the same, but also when I edit the docker again, the extra parameters field still has the info in it, almost as if it's read-only Quote Link to comment
richardsim7 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 Appears I fixed it, I had two templates for sab: my-sabnzbd\ (1).xml and my-SABnzbd.xml I removed the extra one and seems to be working as normal Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 7, 2018 Author Share Posted October 7, 2018 5 minutes ago, richardsim7 said: Appears I fixed it, I had two templates for sab: my-sabnzbd\ (1).xml and my-SABnzbd.xml I removed the extra one and seems to be working as normal Good. You save me from going "Huh?!?" on your description. Quote Link to comment
extrobe Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Hi - having a bit of trouble with the extended test. It's been 'running' for best part of 3 days now, but don't think it's actually doing anything. On the plugin tab, it says it's processing a specific share ( Status: Processing /mnt/user/wAppDataBackup) , but it's been like that for most of the time it has been running. There's no disk activity, so don't think it's actually doing anything But unsure how to check / force stop / if this is actually normal or not Quote Link to comment
Slippin' Jimmy Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 It's told me I have machine check events errors. I've installed mcelog and ran the diagnostics under tools and attached them. Help would be appreciated. tower-diagnostics-20181018-1356.zip Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.