Dazog Posted May 8, 2020 Share Posted May 8, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tucubanito07 said: I hope that little birdie is correct. Obviously I hope the unraid team is safe, I just wanted to see if they had an update that’s all. We’ll be safe out there and have a great day. They are moving very quickly. But the changes could cause file loss if not tested, hence why they aren't rushing out beta's. Imagine people losing data and freaking out about why wasn't this tested more Plus they need to give plugin creators time to support Multi-Language support. Edited May 8, 2020 by Dazog Link to comment
Tucubanito07 Posted May 8, 2020 Share Posted May 8, 2020 18 minutes ago, Dazog said: They are moving very quickly. But the changes could cause file loss if not tested, hence why they aren't rushing out beta's. Imagine people losing data and freaking out about why wasn't this tested more Plus they need to give plugin creators time to support Multi-Language support. I agree with you. Link to comment
starbetrayer Posted May 8, 2020 Share Posted May 8, 2020 5 hours ago, Dazog said: They are moving very quickly. But the changes could cause file loss if not tested, hence why they aren't rushing out beta's. Imagine people losing data and freaking out about why wasn't this tested more Plus they need to give plugin creators time to support Multi-Language support. I agree, I bet they are testing recovery of the multiple pools. Link to comment
sirfaber Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Just wanted to give my thanks to the team for the effort in 6.9! I'm patiently waiting to 5.x to leverage the new HW. I very much appreciate you working on this even in the general stress situation we're in... Keep up the good work!! 3 Link to comment
Dazog Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) @limetech https://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/ixgbe stable/5.7.1/ Intel FINALLY gets around 5.6 support out of kernel. Edited May 13, 2020 by Dazog 1 Link to comment
Alexander Posted May 15, 2020 Share Posted May 15, 2020 (edited) On 5/13/2020 at 11:31 PM, Dazog said: @limetech https://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/ixgbe stable/5.7.1/ Intel FINALLY gets around 5.6 support out of kernel. From link above. Changes in this release: - Added support for 5.6 kernel version (probably = next stable unraid 6.9.x) ixgbe is linux driver for for intel 10 Gb network controllers 82598 and 82599. Source: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005688/network-and-i-o/ethernet-products.html Edited May 15, 2020 by Alexander Link to comment
poniz Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 any status on beta2? or rc? been a while since any new release info has come out, not complaining running 6.8.3 without any issues. Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 Should be soon(™), lots of work to get multiple pools working as problem free and safely as possibly from the get go, likely much more than anticipated. 1 1 Link to comment
jowi Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 On 3/28/2020 at 11:07 AM, jowi said: From the 6.8 release: "Linux kernel We started 6.8 development and initial testing using Linux 5.x kernel. However there remains an issue when VM's and Docker containers using static IP addresses are both running on the same host network interface. This issue does not occur with the 4.19 kernel. We are still studying this issue and plan to address it in the Unraid 6.9 release." Is this (or will this be) solved in this release? ANY news on this yet? Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 16 minutes ago, jowi said: ANY news on this yet? Yes, it's fixed for upcoming release: https://forums.unraid.net/bug-reports/prereleases/68-rc1-kernel-tun-unexpected-gso-r634/?do=findComment&comment=8945 2 Link to comment
Tucubanito07 Posted May 21, 2020 Share Posted May 21, 2020 2 hours ago, johnnie.black said: Yes, it's fixed for upcoming release: https://forums.unraid.net/bug-reports/prereleases/68-rc1-kernel-tun-unexpected-gso-r634/?do=findComment&comment=8945 Awesome thank you @johnnie.black Link to comment
poniz Posted May 26, 2020 Share Posted May 26, 2020 im sure its a ton a work, very grateful for all the dev hours put in 1 Link to comment
HectorG Posted May 26, 2020 Share Posted May 26, 2020 thank you to unraid team, I have been enjoying my experience with it and have already decided to purchase it. 2 Link to comment
Golfonauta Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 On 3/20/2020 at 12:55 AM, limetech said: Multiple cache pools being internally tested now. Multi array pools not in the cards for this release. Please allow SAS drives to spin down before even getting more array pools, I think spinning SAS drives up and down should not be that difficult and will allow us to have larger arrays. Then we will be so happy to get multiple pools Thanks a lot. Link to comment
stl88083365 Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 Can you ask me when the new version of unraid will be available for trial? Link to comment
Tucubanito07 Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 58 minutes ago, stl88083365 said: Can you ask me when the new version of unraid will be available for trial? When is the next new unraid version available? 3 5 Link to comment
Cliff Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 Is there any planned updates regarding Wireguard ? I think the possibility to route only specific docker-traffic through the Wireguard interface is wanted by many. Link to comment
Mantene Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 5 hours ago, Cliff said: Is there any planned updates regarding Wireguard ? I think the possibility to route only specific docker-traffic through the Wireguard interface is wanted by many. Until that is a feature, I would think it should be possible to build wireguard into the containers. I haven't experimented with that, but I would imagine it should be possible. I could be very very wrong though. Link to comment
Darksurf Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 On 6/2/2020 at 5:49 AM, Cliff said: Is there any planned updates regarding Wireguard ? I think the possibility to route only specific docker-traffic through the Wireguard interface is wanted by many. This actually shouldn't be too difficult? Wireguard could run on the host and connect to a bridge you setup on the host, then connect all your dockers to that specific bridge. IIRC SpaceInvaderone shows you how to add a "proxynet" docker network (bridge) on youtube. Then you could possibly setup one wireguard tunnel to lead to that bridge? This is all in theory, I've not personally tried this. Link to comment
Killerfly Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Can we get an update what is going on whit the beta, 3 month whit no info from limetech, is just not ok 2 Link to comment
tjb_altf4 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 On 6/2/2020 at 6:49 PM, Cliff said: Is there any planned updates regarding Wireguard ? I think the possibility to route only specific docker-traffic through the Wireguard interface is wanted by many. I think the Linuxserver guys have a docker image that could accommodate this, don't think there is an unraid template yet though 1 Link to comment
BiosDude Posted June 7, 2020 Share Posted June 7, 2020 As a firmware developer, I appreciate all the effort that goes into getting a new release ready for deployment in the wild. There's regression testing, talking with active plugin developers, usability studies, validation testing, fuzz testing, scanning for copyrighted material, etc... Oh crap, bug found. Start over at the beginning and repeat until it is good enough to deploy. Have arguments about what is "good enough". Defeature what isn't stable for this release. Start over with testing. This is the normal stress involved. Now add in COVID on top of it and turn the blender up to 11. I'm sure they are doing what they can as fast as they can giving the circumstances of their professional and personal lives. Remember, updates are FREE for life and their personal lives are none of our business. They released 6.8.3 just 3 months ago. 4 Link to comment
Marshalleq Posted June 7, 2020 Share Posted June 7, 2020 16 minutes ago, BiosDude said: As a firmware developer, I appreciate all the effort that goes into getting a new release ready for deployment in the wild. There's regression testing, talking with active plugin developers, usability studies, validation testing, fuzz testing, scanning for copyrighted material, etc... Oh crap, bug found. Start over at the beginning and repeat until it is good enough to deploy. Have arguments about what is "good enough". Defeature what isn't stable for this release. Start over with testing. This is the normal stress involved. Now add in COVID on top of it and turn the blender up to 11. I'm sure they are doing what they can as fast as they can giving the circumstances of their professional and personal lives. Remember, updates are FREE for life and their personal lives are none of our business. They released 6.8.3 just 3 months ago. Devops Link to comment
cobhc Posted June 8, 2020 Share Posted June 8, 2020 (edited) On 6/4/2020 at 10:36 AM, Killerfly said: Can we get an update what is going on whit the beta, 3 month whit no info from limetech, is just not ok That's an unbelievably selfish view to have on this. We would all like a new release with new features, bugs fixed, etc. but it's not as simple as just flicking a switch and with the current world pandemic things are likely to take even longer. The fact that your only post on here is to bitch that it's been 3 months since a release speaks volumes about how little you know about development and thus aren't in the position to be able to judge. Edited June 8, 2020 by cobhc 4 Link to comment
bonienl Posted June 8, 2020 Share Posted June 8, 2020 On 6/4/2020 at 11:36 AM, Killerfly said: Can we get an update what is going on whit the beta Update: there is a lot going one On 6/2/2020 at 12:49 PM, Cliff said: Is there any planned updates regarding Wireguard ? Yes, there are always plans 3 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts