Leaderboard

The attachment in this post is a joint effort between @Batter Pudding and myself. @Batter Pudding supplied much of the technical part of the Attached Document and I provide most of the background information. What we are attempting to do is to show that it is easy to actually use Unraid with all of the security features that Microsoft has incorporated into Windows 10. What many of us have been doing (myself included) is to reverse those enhancements to security and use our Unraid network in what is basically a 2010 security environment. @limetechhas announced in the release thread for version 6.9.2 that they are about to increase security on Unraid in future releases. Unfortunately, this list is going to impact a lot of current Unraid users as many have setup their Unraid servers and networking to use these very features. Each user will have two choices. Either embrace security or spend time to undo each new security addition that either LimeTech or MS adds in their updates. If you decide to continue to bypass security, just realize that the number of folks prepared to assist you with any problems doing this will probably decline as more folks adopt increased security as a necessity. In some cases, this is going to present some difficult decisions. For example, I have an old Netgear NTV-550 set top media player (last firmware/software update was in early 2011) that only supports SMBv1 or NFS. Do I open up a security hole to use a well-functioning piece of equipment or do I replace it? (The choice, obviously, is one that only I can make...) Two Important things! Do not post up any problems that you have with networking between Windows 10 and Unraid in this thread! Start a new thread in the General Support forum. Please don’t tell us that there is another way to do something and that we should change our recommendation to employ that method. If you feel you have a better way, you are encouraged to write it up in detail and post it in this thread pointing out the advantages of your way. (One well regarded Windows 10 networking book has over 400 pages in it. Our document is 16 pages long…) EDIT: November 30, 2021. Recently, something has come to my attention about Unraid and SMB. There have been incidences where access to Unraid shares is restricted or blocked completely from users who should have access to it. What has been found in these cases is that a feature, has been enable on the Unraid side, called Access Control Lists (ACL for short). This will show up as an ‘+’ at the end of the Linux permissions. See the screen capture below: Note that the ‘+’ is also on the file as well as the share/directory. ACL changes the way that Linux is going to control access to these resources. After some research, I found out that Windows has used ACL for a long time. The SAMBA group has added ACL into its version of SMB. Unraid does not use ACL in its security scheme. At the present time, I can think of only one way that a ACL could be found on any Unraid server. It was done by a Windows user who was trying to change how SMB worked by applying Windows security features to an Unraid share by changing the default Security settings. (Basically, right-clicking on the Share in Windows Explorer, selecting ‘Properties’, then the ‘Security’ tab and working from there.) The point I am making is that you can’t fix a share access problem by trying to change a Unraid share security using Windows security tools on that share. If you try, you will probably make things worst! (Unless you are a Windows SMB Networking Guru…) It is important to realize that if you are denied permission to an Unraid share resource, the problem can only be fixed on the Unraid side using the Tools in the Unraid GUI (or via the command line for specific problems). If you are having an access problem to a Unraid share and can’t solve it with the tools in the GUI, start a thread in the General Support sub-forum and let the community help you fix it. EDIT: February 25, 2024. It has come to my attention that there is one more setting that was not previously covered. The Network type should be set as 'Private'. For Windows 10 Open up Settings Pick Network & Internet In right panel, click on Properties button In the Network Properties, select the 'Private' radio button. For Windows 11 Open up Settings In left panel, pick Network & Internet In the Right Panel at the top, click on Properties Under Network Profile type, click on the 'Private network' radio button EDIT: March 15, 2024 It has come to my attention that there can be problems in linking the Network Neighborhood folder into Windows File Explorer in Windows 11. While there is a solution to that problem, it has some other side effects and the full scope of those has not been evaluated. In addition, I have become aware of another way to integrate access of servers into Windows File Explorer that works quite well if you have only a few servers. (Things start to look messy if one adds more than two or three servers but that is a matter of each individual’s perception of “messy”.) So if you have having any problems with implementing "Network Neighborhood", try this new approach! This new method is actually quite simple to set up. This method is described in the attached PDF file named: “An Alternative Method to Network Neighborhood.PDF” Unraid & Windows 10 SMB Setup.pdf An Alternative Method to Network Neighborhood.pdf

During one of our Private Message discussions, @Batter Pudding suggested that ‘Short Sheets’ of the steps involved in each procedure could be beneficial. I know that when I am doing any multi-step procedure, I like have have a printout of the procedure and check off each step as I complete it. The attachments to this posting are the short sheets for each procedure in the document in the first post. EDIT: March 15, 2024 Added the PDF for "An Alternative Method to Network Neighborhood". How To #1-Advance Network Settings.pdf How to #2-Fixing the Windows Explorer Issue.pdf How to #3– Turning Off “SMB 1.0_CIFS File Sharing Support”.pdf How to #4-Adding a SMB User to Unraid.pdf How to #5-Adding a Windows Credential.pdf An Alternative Method to Network Neighborhood.pdf

Docker host and docker bridge networks can only operate on IPv4, to use IPv6 you need to configure a custom network. The example below is going to use br0 as custom docker network with both IPv4 and IPv6 (you can disable the bonding part when a single interface is used). First: make sure under network settings both IPv4 and IPv6 is enabled. The preference is to use automatic IPv6 assignment, using either DHCP or SLAAC. Your router must be properly configured to hand-out an IPv6 address and associated DNS server address(es). Second: Under Docker settings enable the necessary br0 networks for both IPv4 and IPv6 Note: - Configure a DHCP pool for IPv4 which hands out IPv4 addresses to containers and does NOT clash with the DHCP range of your router. - Leave the DHCP pool for IPv6 disabled, docker uses an assignment which won't clash with your router Configure a docker container to use custom network br0. The example below shows the Firefox application. Since Firefox is a browser, it can be used to access the Internet on both IPv4 and IPv6 and we can test connectivity... Use ipv6-test.com Note: Certain traffic in my network is inhibited due to the firewall rules I have created on my router (out of scope for this tutorial).

It is only one day, it does vary a bit day to day but looks like disabling those logs dropped the writes from 75-85gb/day to 50gb/day. Not bad really. Think I will give it one more day and then disable the healthchecks and see how that does.

Lies mal https://earthly.dev/blog/dos-gaming-in-docker/ jsdos gibt es für Unraid als Docker.

Das ist nicht nur Retro, sondern schon Ancient. Willkommen im Club der alten Säcke bzw. Schachteln. 😜 JoergHH, Jg. 1962

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/06/mass-data-wipe-in-my-book-devices-prompts-warning-from-western-digital/

Great stuff @Frank1940 and @Batter Pudding! Thanks for putting this together.

Thank you @bonienl! As always you are a rockstar!

Good day! The next version of Machinaris is now available: v0.4.0. Thanks to all those who tested and provided feedback during the release cycle. All contributions are appreciated! Changes: - Support for the Madmax plotter, in addition to the official Chia plotter. - Manage multiple plotters, harvesters, and farmers across your LAN, all from a single WebUI on one controller system. - A full REST API for developers to extend and integrate with Machinaris. Notes: * Due to configuration file changes in Plotman, you may need to save a new config on your Settings | Plotting page: * --> get a Chia plotter template * --> get a Madmax plotter template

Yup it's pulling the binaries! Thanks and have a great weekend!

Enabling IP passthrough would send your public ATT IP address to the Unraid server. Basically your server was publicly exposed to the Internet. No wonder you were having issues.

Ja, hab ich schon bei 2 Platten gemacht, brauchst aber glaube ich noch das unassigned plugin dazu.

Did you click the link (HERE)?

Yes, but with the server getting power from a different source so it stays running. Put a load roughly equivalent to the server on the UPS output, and turn off the power feeding the UPS but not the server (obviously). You may need to tweak the battery voltage low value to match what value actually shows up in NUT a few seconds before the UPS shuts itself down from low battery. Once the UPS shuts itself off, turn the power back on with the dummy load running and time how long it takes to return the battery to voltage high so you know the recharge rate. During this testing, make sure NUT is configured NOT to shut down the server.

this solved my problem! again: thank you!

@guybrush2012 Die zweite Unraid IP ist der shim-br0 für den Host Zugriff, wie ihr schon rausgefunden habt. Dieser wechselt auch die MAC nach jedem Unraid Neustart. Meine ganze Fritzbox ist voll mit dem doppelten Unraid eintrag. Der Host Access ist aber (glaube ich) von Nöten, wenn per Wireguard auf nen Pihole der auf Unraid läuft, zugefriffen werden soll. Thema IPv6/IPv4 zugriff auf Unraid bei nem DualStack Light anschluss könnte dir der Cloudflare-Tunnel helfen, oder wenn du CF nicht traust dies: In dem Vortrag wird gut erklärt wie man die DualStack Light Thematik behandeln könnte.

woke up to this... oldest plot is 5/19, so took a bit over a month for my first reward.

oh i thought that was just a comment, didn't realise it was a post lol thanks i'll take a look.

Jaja, gib nur an... Ich bin mit DOS, Windows 3.11 und Windows 98 "aufgewachsen". Ja durchaus, aber gerade bei sachen die um die Jahrtausendwende rauskamen (bzw. eigentlich von 1995 bis 2003) ist das immer ein wenig schwierig, Thema 3dfx und 3D Beschleuniger da ging generell alles wie im Flug...

Awesome! Thank you so much!

@SuperMeatBoy666...könnnte?! Ja, aber ohne Anleitung?? Hier ein Hinweis, das es geht: zum HWLuxx

...ich stell mal meinen Stuhl hier rein, wenn auch etwas OT. Bin ja gar kein Gamer (nach dem Atari ST habe ich aufgehört)...aber habe hier immer noch "Lost Treasures of Infocom, Teil I und II (Zork und Co.) in der Schublade...ich glaube mich zu erinnern, die brauchen gar keine Grafik 🤣 @ich777...ist das Retro?

I would also recommend replacing/swapping cables with another disk before rebuilding to rule that out if it happens again to the same disk.

https://wiki.unraid.net/Manual/Storage_Management#Rebuilding_a_drive_onto_itself It's always been the same, just make sure the emulated disk is mounting and contents look correct before doing it.

Disk dropped offline, SMART looks fine, most likely a connection/power issue.

I think to solve the problem try this first: Open the Unraid WebGUI and click on the Flash drive (blue text) Make sure that you've selected the LibreELEC drivers in the DVB Driver plugin Scroll a little down and add this to your syslinux.cfg: 'cx23885.card=35' (without quotes) Scroll down to the bottom and click "Apply" Reboot your server and see if it is now recognized and shows up in TVHeadend I think the module cx23885 probes against the wrong device and so it's not showing up (you can get a full list of supported cards and probes here: Click - your card should be #35) If the card is again not recognized please post your Diagnostics here again.

WT...? Das gibt es doch nicht :-D Mit den TP-Link Modulen fahre ich eindeutig besser, als mit den alten FRITZ Powerline Modulen. Wenn die Telekom der Meinung ist, die Module wären verboten, dann sollen die mir ein LAN Kabel in den Keller ziehen :-)

Thank you for the report, try to update the container again. Seems like the main Jellyfin 10.7.6 package wasn't ready when my server built the container for 10.7.6 EDIT: Looked at the logs for the first 10.7.6 build and this was the exact problem, all packages where available for 10.7.6 except for the 'jellyfin-server'. 'jellyfin-server' was still on 10.7.5 anyways, everything is now on 10.7.6 Triggered the build for 10.7.6 and now erverything should work properly and be the right version.

Will look into this ASAP, seems like it can't pull the version feom the newest NWN:EE build. Fixed! Please update the container and try it again.

@ich777 Do you know why the Jellyfin server in your container is not updating to 1.0.7.6 when the web client is?

Have you had a look at Booksonic? Might do what you want.