Leaderboard

Wie soll denn sonst die Parität erstellt werden?! Deshalb wird eigentlich auch empfohlen, bei der "Erstbetankung" ohne Paritätsfestplatte zu starten (dann aber Daten auch nur kopieren und nicht verschieben, damit man immer noch eine Sicherheit hat) und erst wenn alles drauf ist eine Parity dem Array hinzuzufügen.

Moin, da ich gerade das X13SAE-F in Betrieb genommen habe, mit 14th Gen Intel und Du vom 14500 sprachst, wirst Du wohl auch ein Update vom BIOS machen müssen. Ich habe die CPU installiert und hatte kein Bild. BIOS war 2.0a, von März 2023, also wohl nicht kompatibel: Was habe ich also gemacht? Denn immerhin hatte ich ja kein Bild: - IPMIViewer 2.2.1 von der Supermicroseite besorgt - BIOS 3.1 von der Updateseite besorgt, auf einen Stick im root gepackt (FAT32) - LAN-Kabel an den IPMI-Port und im Router die IP geholt - IPMIViewer installiert und als admin geöffnet (Name: ADMIN, Passwort steht auf dem Aufkleber mittig auf dem Mainboard) - Konsole geöffnet und daran darin das Shell (Kannst Du auch, wenn du mit DEL das BIOS öffnest und dann bei "Save & Exit" unter "Boot Override" entsprechend "UEFI: Built-in EFI Shell" wählst und darin booten lässt. - Dann auf den Stick wechseln (bei mir "fs0:" ohne "") - Dort habe ich dann den flash gestartet mit "flash .nsh BIOS....bin" (Datei musste ich den Namen der BIOS-Datei angeben). Dann habe ich abgewartet, bis er fertig war (5-10 min.) und er hat auch neu gestartet. Anschließend konnte hatte ich ein Bild und brauchte mir keine CPU der 12th oder 13th Gen. besorgen oder es einschicken, wovon ich öfter las. Vielleicht kannst Du oder jemand anders das ja mal gebrauchen oder vielleicht ich selber später nochmal . Alle Angaben natürlich ohne Gewähr und Haftung übernehme ich auch nicht, aber so habe ich es gestern gemacht. Viele Grüße Nils

To write in an impassionate way isn't the definition of rant. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rant And I am not impassionate, I am frustrated that I even have to point out something that should be glaringly obvious. Glaringly obvious isn't depending on posts or time spent in forums btw. It's great, no question. I paid for a license because it is. It isn't, however, willing-to-pay-for-subscription-on-top-of-license-great. Once again: What makes or breaks a subscription model is a continuous added-value proposition that works for the subscriber. People sign up for streaming services, Office365, newspapers, pool memberships because they get a clear, continuous benefit from it. Every day, every week, every month they pay they get something they want in exchange for that money. No matter how hard you try to ignore this: unRAID's new licensing model doesn't even have a defined value proposition. And to make things worse, they don't just switch to subscription (which would be difficult to sell already), they ask you to buy a full license first. That's a business licensing model ported into the end-user space, where such models rarely work--even if they offer a clearly defined, high-demand benefit in return for the money. If they would have switched to a "19.99 a year"-software-as-a-service model, I think they would probably struggle as well to convince new users, but it would at least make sense, especially if they added some online service to the package (like MS does with Office 365). Asking users to pay 40-90 dollars for a license and then asking them to pay for a subscription on top in order to get bug-fixing and security for the software you already bought is basically asking them to look elsewhere. If you don't understand that, you apparently don't understand how the NAS-market looks like, at least for home users. People assign a budget to these things. They decided against a Synology (etc) ready-to-deploy system because they expect additional benefit in return for their investment of time and money. And now they are asked to accept a constantly growing budget for something that the vast majority of software and hardware companies factor into the price and provide for free. And not only that. Those new users are also asked to pay continuously--when the vast majority of users they encounter in the forums have perpetual licenses and get the very same updates and features for free. Do you really believe those prospective new users are going to miss the fact that they are not only asked to pay for both a license and a subscription (which is unusual and bad in itself) but that in this system, their subscription money subsidizes the service provided to a majority of existing users who pay nothing? Do you really think they miss the fact that they are effectively asked to become suckers? No aspect of the software is going to gloss over the fact that this proposition is ridiculously bad and unfair to those new users. No level of denial will make the fact go away that prospective new users won't overlook that it is. And if they are smart, they will understand immediately that this model will likely fail--casting a big doubt on the future of the system they are asked to subsidize. As an existing user, the fact that this was decided and publicly announced is making me question the decision-making infrastructure at LT. Because either nobody realized the above, or everybody lives in denial. Neither option would be great. And no, I am not ignoring LT's perspective. Again, as stated multiple times before: I believe they should have explained the situation to existing users, asked them to accept a voluntary switch to a pay-by-version model and installed the same model for new users. I would have accepted that and would have paid a (reasonable) upgrade fee for each mainline version. Because that would be making sense from a budget POV, it would be fair to the developers, to existing and new users, and it would ensure that the company and the software stay in business, which is the one thing everyone involved is interested in. So instead of calling my posts a rant or focusing on the irrelevant part of how much time I spent in the forums, may I suggest you provide an argumentation why what I pointed out above isn't true or relevant? I doubt you can.

Summary: Support Thread for ich777 Gameserver Dockers (CounterStrike: Source & ConterStrike: GO, TeamFortress 2, ArmA III,... - complete list in the second post) Application: SteamCMD DockerHub: https://hub.docker.com/r/ich777/steamcmd All dockers are easy to set up and are highly customizable, all dockers are tested with the standard configuration (port forwarding,...) if the are reachable and show up in the server list form the "outside". The default password for the gameservers if enabled is: Docker It there is a admin password the default password is: adminDocker Please read the discription of each docker and the variables that you install (some dockers need special variables to run). The Steam Username and Password is only needed in templates where the two fields are marked as requirde with the red * Created a Steam Group: https://steamcommunity.com/groups/dockersforunraid If you like my work, please consider making a donation

Jap, das ist so "by Design" Ist jetzt aber auch alles andere als ein Geheimnis. Mit dem Cache kann man die Schreibzugriffe beschleunigen, lesen geht maximal mit der Geschwindigkeit der jeweils angesprochen HDD. Willst du mehr musst du Pools nutzen

Das ist das Kernelement des Unraid Arrays - eine in Echtzeit aktualisierte Parity. Das ähnelt einem RAID-4: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#RAID_4:_Block-Level_Striping_mit_Paritätsinformationen_auf_separater_Festplatte Musst halt Reconstruct Write aktivieren - mit allen Vor- und Nachteilen (z.B. erhöte Stromkosten) die sich dadurch ergeben. Das ist für eines der beiden kommenden Release geplant.

I have the same motherboard (rev 1.3) updated to the latest FD bios of 2024, I have read a lot on forums and I have tried them all including scewin by modifying the hidden parameters of the bios for aspm but there was no success. I also downloaded the latest version of Ubuntu and aspm doesn't work, but with Windows 11 the energy saving comes with C6 and aspm works. I think it's a linux kernel problem 🙃

Thank you so much for your help on this! Life saver!

This time unfortunately there's nothing relevant logged, one thing you can try is to boot the server in safe mode with all docker containers/VMs disabled, let it run as a basic NAS for a few days, if it still crashes it's likely a hardware problem, if it doesn't start turning on the other services one by one.

This thread is not good for support, please create a new thread in the general support forum and post the same diags there.

Voilá, auf Spatzl hör ich natürlich umgehend. Server Idle jetzt bei C8 mit 82% und die Core geht auf C7 mit 88%. Aktuell verbraucht er voll verbaut um die 18-19 Watt. Der hintere 120er Lüfter ist meistens aus, der vordere mit 140mm nimmt Fahrt auf, um die HDDs zu kühlen, wenn die was tun müssen und der Kühler der CPU fährt erst ab 40 Grad hoch, was momentan relativ selten ist. Mein piKVM verbraucht um die 2 Watt zusätzlich, hab ich aber jetzt einfach mal abgeschaltet Auf C9 oder gar C10 komme ich nicht, dürfte aber normal sein. Und: Ich setze wie anderswo erwähnt auf die Unraid 6.12.4 Version, denn mit der aktuellen komme ich nicht in die tiefen C-States. Oder hat jemand noch einen "heißeren" Tipp?! Da ich aber mit KVM auch aus- und einschalten kann, muss ich jetzt mal schauen, ob der Server nicht auch immer mal wieder runterfahren darf und nicht durchlaufen muss

das macht auch Sinn ... weil dann wird es wirklich "slow" ... du vergleichst jetzt HDD Write Speed rsync Copy Speed der HDD Write Speed ist entscheidender, der Rsync wird brutaler schwanken ...

Häh? Was verstehst Du unter "Sync ist aus"? Du hast ein Parity-Protected Array. immer wenn Du schreibst, dann wird auch die Parity beschrieben.

Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:6:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:1:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:2:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:5:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:3:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Mar 11 09:22:21 NAS kernel: sd 9:0:4:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Still looks like a power/connection issue. Unassign both parity drives, start array, stop array, reassign both parity drive, start array, ideally after trying to fix the issue, or it will likely happen again.

oh man! Peinlich, offensichtlich werde ich älter! 😄 @alturismo, Danke Dir!

so, it’s now 2 days and 17hours, and it’s not crashed in safe mode with no dockers running with the array online. So at the moment it’s looking possible like the containers may be the culprit. i will keep it going for another few days and then see how i get on turning the containers on progressively.

Do not think you can do both at the same time, so replace the parity drive first.

du weist links zu ob port oder device mapping zu VM's gesetzt wird danach erscheinen die Geräte unten welche zugewiesen sind ... Bsp. ich nutze NUR port mapping

Danke dir für den Hinweis auf die Plugins und de system temp thread. Das LTE-Plugin hat zumindest einen der 3 verbauten Lüfter gefunden... Jetzt muss ich nur noch rausfinden, welcher das ist.

Changing that fixed the logs. The stability seems a lot better aswell. Marking your answer as solution. Thank you so much.

ok, i thought thats what i did, but may didnt klick on the right spot and didnt notice im on "device" instead "port", seems removing device fixed it sorry and thanks.

Welches Fenster? Eine SSH Session aus z.B. Putty heraus? Mit Schließen des Fensters wird die Session mit dem laufenden Programm abgeschossen. Es sei denn man arbeitet mit screen o.ä. Mit dem DFM? Der Fortschritt steht dann unten links in der Unraid GUI und kann auch wieder als Fenster dargestellt werden. Über die Unraid Konsole? Keine Ahnung - nie verwendet. Vermute sie verhält sich wie eine Putty Session. Kann mich aber auch irren. Muss ich mal ausprobieren. Nachlaufende Plattenaktivitäten kommen auf jeden Fall aus dem Linux RAM Cache. Nachtrag: Schließen der Unraid GUI Konsole schießt ebenfalls alle laufenden Programme in der Session ab: # # Unraid Konsole geöffnet, MC gestartet # root@Tower:~# ps -ef | grep mc root 2005 1 0 Feb16 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/mcelog --daemon root 27188 26969 0 07:33 pts/2 00:00:00 /usr/bin/mc -P /tmp/mc-root/mc.pwd.26969 root 29256 27586 0 07:34 pts/4 00:00:00 grep mc # # Konsolenfenster geschlossen # -> MC wurde abgeschossen # root@Tower:~# ps -ef | grep mc root 2005 1 0 Feb16 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/mcelog --daemon root 29869 27586 0 07:34 pts/4 00:00:00 grep mc

This seems to be the solution, the speed is not consistent 250 MB/s, but much much better than what it was before, thank you!

Updated OLD unraid server with some difficulty. But you are spot on, i can now use unassigned devices to mount the drive. Thank you so much for the help

Thanks for pointing this out. Obviously when grepping the entire config, I'm not saying "delete every mention of X" but more "hey this might send you in the right direction". Might not necessarily be the dockers, could be a forgotten user script or whatever plugin, hence the wider grep. Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

Ok, here we are. Assuming we are in the "subscription" model (or call it yearly update fee) and you are using 6.12.6 and security patch 6.12.8 is out but you are past that 1-year window so you are left out of update, which is a major security fix. That model is not good at all. LT will need to maintain more branch and they will need to provide roadmap and incentive to purchase the product. We don't even have a clue about what are the advantages to switch model. There is none. This is a community driven software by the way and I'm pretty sure you will not see the increase in customer. The money boom will come before the change and it will dry after.

Ah yes, I had forgotten about that. I am passing an optical drive through to a vm, so I had to bind the SATA controller. I had made a mental note when I did that, but I apparently misfiled that mental note. Luckily I had a SATA expansion card, so I just installed that. Everything is working now. Thank you so much @JorgeB!!

MCE's you need to post your diagnostics The edac message is informative and doesn't actually mean anything

Assuming that the proxy.cfg file for CA is setup correctly, does changing the line instead to be $jsonPage = download_url("https://registry.hub.docker.com/v1/search?q=$filter&page=$pageNumber"); fix it?

我认为这应该是CA的BUG，从其源码来看是直接在shell里面运行curl命令去搜索DockerHub，但却没有添加-x参数指定代理。 CA已经更新版本修复了这个问题，升级最新版即可。 临时应对办法是修改/usr/local/emhttp/plugins/community.applications/include/exec.php文件， 将： shell_exec("curl -s -X GET 'https://registry.hub.docker.com/v1/search?q=$filter&page=$pageNumber'"); 修改为： shell_exec("curl -x http://YOUR_PROXY -s -X GET 'https://registry.hub.docker.com/v1/search?q=$filter&page=$pageNumber'"); 增加一个-x参数指定代理地址即可。

Backup your flash drive first. You probably won't need it but doing so increases those odds! 😁

Can be caused by the database corruption that is now hopefully fixed. I can't look more into this unless I have more data on exactly when that happened. If new cases comes up with that issue, I will know if the new implementation works or not. But thanks for reporting it.

"They"...aha! And of course "they" are all the same, those cheap peasants. I bet that nearly everyone who voiced critical opinions about the changes here has decided against a whole bouquet of free alternatives and paid money for an unRAID license. So yeah, not exactly convincing your diagnose. Frankly, it looks a bit fanboyish and defensive. You would look a lot better if you actually came up with convincing arguments why this new model is fair to the user and why you expect it to be a success. As pointed out before, I don't see how someone can regard a model as fair that combines an initial license fee much higher than in regular subscription models with reoccurring charges for what is essentially bug fixing--without any clear commitment on the company's side. If you see things differently, it would help to point out why. So no, people over her who are critical don't want "everything for free." They simply point out that the new licensing model doesn't look like a fair deal. It is rather silly and self-defeating to claim that people are cheap or should go elsewhere "if they don't like it." Because if they do and if the new model doesn't attract any new customers, the company will eventually run out of cash and the system will meet its end alongside the business. As I pointed out in one of my earlier comments, I was planning to buy a secondary license in the nearer future, but won't in the new system, because I am not getting a fair deal. And I am already sold on unRAID. The new model will be much harder to sell to people who are just building their first NAS and who compare the competing options. It's a lot of good systems for free out there--vs the paid system that you will have to pay forever for. I would actually prefer NOT to be grandfathered with my current license and to have a reasonable update fee for each main version switch for everyone--even though it would cost me more personally. Because in such a model, even the old-license users would get a fair deal and actual workable alternative options. Buying a new license would not becoming utterly unattractive, the company would be obligated to make the big version updates worth their price. I asked in an earlier post if anyone could name a company that runs such a licensing model--a combination of a fullish-price fee for starters followed by annual subscription fees--and thrives. Can you? And if not, I don't see what you derive your optimism from. 1) Nobody rants here. 2) Good for you that you experienced a HDD failure and survived it without data loss. I see that you consider that a major achievement of yours. From here, it looks a bit funny though that you based your elitist attitude on that. 3) You do understand LT needs a lot of those "new users" you seem to consider of lesser importance? Because you and me won't be paying for that subscription model. You think someone who considers buying a license later this year and reads your statements is more likely to shell money out in order to share a forum with you?

It's there, but you need to disable the docker service first.

Problem with that is the need for an external controller. The point of this is to control fans connected to mobo

I had to chime in, this hit a nerve. I agree with 1812, they want everything for free. Even downloading movies. They will spend the money for hardware but software they want for free or next to nothing. Take a look at the users that rant the most. They are fairly new members. I doubt they have experienced a hard disk failure. This is where Unraid shines. If they complain about pricing, I doubt they use parity drive(s). I say let them leave and go to an alternative. I chose Unraid 14 years ago. Back then the biggest concern was LT’s risk management since Tom was a one man show. I wanted a system to be expandable, I wanted to use my various sized hard disks. I wanted the disk to spin down and I liked the idea that you could still access a disk by itself. It had to be an unconventional server, Unraid fit the bill. I went with the pro license at that time since it was the only one that covered my hard disk count. I just checked my email invoice from “Tom” and it was on sale for $109 ($10 discount) at that time. I spent more for a UPS. Soon I was maxed out and bought two 1TB drives, then larger drives and survived through the 2TB limit! I have experienced the introduction of Joe L.’s creations; cache_dirs, unMENU and preclear. We endured a number of LT re-locations. Unraid has come along way. Thanks Tom! Sorry, I haven’t been active on this forum lately, I been busy doing other things and frankly, Unraid just works. I have recovered through a number of hard disk failures, parity swaps, array up sizing and array down sizing. All painlessly. BTW, I still have the original flash drive. I didn’t cheap out on that. I’ve recommended and help setup Unraid using the Pro license to lots of people and not one complained about the cost. When my kids finally move out, we will happily pay for the “Lifetime” license no matter what the cost.

Woohoo! Please see here: Hope to hear from you 🙂

Derr Befehl muss lauten: "sendemail". Da muss noch ein "e" rein

I have swapped out Libreddit for Redlib here. I was able to get it going fairly easily as essentially a drop in replacement at this time. Let me know if there are any issues you see with the deploy. https://github.com/Joshndroid/joshndroid-unraid-docker-templates/commit/17494dafc8a0d33e7a4203f104a82f85b7249737

No Need to set up it in router , just setup the Fixed IP for Adguard in Unraid it will be OK.

NOTE: Not all intel CPU's have QUICK SYNC encoding capabilities (most do, but you'll have to check) Install the following apps on your UNRAID server: Intel-GPU-TOP (Search for ich777 to find the repository and then find Intel-GPU-TOP) Plex-Media-Server GPU Statistics (GPU Statistics isn't required but is nice to have) CONFIGURE PLEX ON UNRAID: (I won't cover everything on how to install PLEX, just how to enable QSV hardware encoding.) Once you've configured PLEX to work already you will need to add the ability to use hardware encoding. On your UNRAID Server, Goto DOCKER and left-click on the PLEX icon and select Edit. Then "Add another Path, Port, Variable, Label or Device", name it (whatever you'd like Intel iGPU or -device /dev/dri it doesn't really matter) and give it the value: /dev/dri/ PLEX ENABLE HARDWARE ENCODING: Use PLEX's WebUI and login to the admin account. Then go to settings (the little wrench icon at the top right). Then on the left panel go to Settings > Transcoder. Enable "User hardware acceleration when available" *CONFIGURE GPU STATISTICS On UNRAID server go to Settings, and then click on GPU Statistics in the User Utilities area. In the Vendor section change it to Intel Still Not working? If you're using ARC or multiple GPU's you may have to do some additional changes (see thread below) Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Thanks b3rs3rk, ich777 for your work on the Apps, and Cpt. Chaz with his video showing how to do this for linuxserver's PLEX app. This easy tutorial wouldn't be possible without your work.

Unraid is interested in enhancing our USB creator with something shiny and new (and supported on Linux!). Are you the right person to help us with this? Tech Stack We'd like to use the Raspberry PI USB Creator as a source codebase since it already supports much of our needed features such as writing custom configs to the USB drive, writing Zip files, writing drives over 32 GB, and online downloads of the OS. What We're Looking For We’re looking for a QT developer to create an MVP of this tool, which includes downloading the OS through our own endpoint by default, downloading Unraid onto a USB drive, and modifying some config options. See the project on Github for an overview of the initial deliverable. We’ve already forked their codebase (keeping it open-source, of course!). How to Apply If you’re interested, fill out the form here: https://form.asana.com/?k=Q5d46R1fLsfe-vrpOrVrkg&d=714739274360802 TLDR: We want you to make our USB creator work on the Raspberry PI Creator codebase to speed it up and modernize it, and we want your help!

Hi all, Firstly, I just want to say sorry in advance, for yet another Plex Transcoding discussion. I know there have been a bunch in the past, which I've read through, but I still can't get mine working, using the GPU. It's constantly maxing out the CPU. I have attached a bunch of screen captures to show you my setup. If anyone has any clue as to what is going on, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much, Mort

Nope I figure it out!!! So the problem was that with HP devices with Intel 12th gen or later, make sure not only to disable secure boot BUT ALSO all the stuff under HP Sure Start, some like that. Once I unchecked all it did boot finally. This problem I had when upgrading my mini PC to my new setup HP Elite Mini 600 G9, i5 12600. Sure Start needs to be OFF on this one along with secure boot. My prior setup was the HP Prodesk 600 G6 i5 10600, which did work with only Secure boot being disabled.

Not as bad as it sounds, only 3 servers are always on, remaining ones are cold storage, they are on about once month or so for a few hours.

Is it possible for HP Elitedesk 800 G4 SFF?

This is just a shot in the dark, but I recently had a similar issue because I had a deleted share that still had a path mapped in a docker. The docker kept recreating the folder/share.